Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Question from Tom - Symbols of married lady


Is a complete ruff a sign that a lady is married or is it the small gold broach in her hair l/h side?



1 Comments:

Anonymous PhD Historian said...

A fascinating question. Queen Elizabeth I was often depicted wearing a full, even masssive, ruff without ever having been married. Bess of Hardwick is usually shown wearing a full ruff, and she was married several times. I am aware of a half-dozen portraits of Bess, but none with a brooch in her hair. On the other hand, the famous portrait of Arbella Stuart at about age 13 (and unmarried) shows here without a ruff, but with a brooch in her hair ... but it is in the middle of her head! I do know that wedding rings were usually specifically shown on the left hand of married women in portraits from the last half of the sixteenth century, so I suspect that acts as a more reliable indicator of marital status than does ruffs or hair attachments. But I'd have to do further research to be more certain.

September 25, 2007 9:26 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home