<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article on the upcoming second season of &quot;The Tudors&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tudorhistory.org/blog/index.php/2008/03/23/article-on-the-upcoming-second-season-of-the-tudors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2008/03/23/article-on-the-upcoming-second-season-of-the-tudors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2008/03/23/article-on-the-upcoming-second-season-of-the-tudors/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2008/03/23/article-on-the-upcoming-second-season-of-the-tudors/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Thanks! Ive got a tough committee, so I may need all the luck I can get! --kate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Ive got a tough committee, so I may need all the luck I can get! &#8211;kate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lara</title>
		<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2008/03/23/article-on-the-upcoming-second-season-of-the-tudors/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2008/03/23/article-on-the-upcoming-second-season-of-the-tudors/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Totally off the subject... good luck with that defense Kate!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally off the subject&#8230; good luck with that defense Kate!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2008/03/23/article-on-the-upcoming-second-season-of-the-tudors/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2008/03/23/article-on-the-upcoming-second-season-of-the-tudors/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>It is nice to see writers being up front about that their right to poetic lisence. However, I wouldnt so much mind the writing for entertainment....if it were good writing. But really, the Henry VIII I saw (admittedly only a few episodes) was annoyingly one-dimensional and overdramatically petulant. For all his reputation later as a moody tyrant, he comes across in his and other writings as a complex person, sometimes petty, sometimes childish, but also quite refined and intelligent. This Henry VIII arm-wrestles with Charles Brandon in order to...settle accounts...prove his superiority...show off Rhy-Meyers&#039; biceps?? H8&#039;s actual response to Brandon and Mary&#039;s marriage was a much more pointed political and economical (and suspenseful for the couple) set of actions.  If you&#039;re going to change history, at least make it as interesting if not more so than your source material.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That said, I adore the Kapur&#039;s direction.... the first Elizabeth was very innovative and memorable in a cinematographic sense. But I also found the film to be disturbingly misogynistic. Comments, anyone? Its two weeks to go until my defense and I rely on this site for daily relief....kate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is nice to see writers being up front about that their right to poetic lisence. However, I wouldnt so much mind the writing for entertainment&#8230;.if it were good writing. But really, the Henry VIII I saw (admittedly only a few episodes) was annoyingly one-dimensional and overdramatically petulant. For all his reputation later as a moody tyrant, he comes across in his and other writings as a complex person, sometimes petty, sometimes childish, but also quite refined and intelligent. This Henry VIII arm-wrestles with Charles Brandon in order to&#8230;settle accounts&#8230;prove his superiority&#8230;show off Rhy-Meyers&#8217; biceps?? H8&#8217;s actual response to Brandon and Mary&#8217;s marriage was a much more pointed political and economical (and suspenseful for the couple) set of actions.  If you&#8217;re going to change history, at least make it as interesting if not more so than your source material.</p>
<p>That said, I adore the Kapur&#8217;s direction&#8230;. the first Elizabeth was very innovative and memorable in a cinematographic sense. But I also found the film to be disturbingly misogynistic. Comments, anyone? Its two weeks to go until my defense and I rely on this site for daily relief&#8230;.kate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2008/03/23/article-on-the-upcoming-second-season-of-the-tudors/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tudorhistory.org/blog/2008/03/23/article-on-the-upcoming-second-season-of-the-tudors/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>How refreshing that a writer of a series admits up front that a lot of what he wrote was for entertainment value...and not for a history lesson!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Although those of us who know the story of the Tudors inside and out find the &#039;real&#039; story doesn&#039;t need any doctoring, a series like this does have to keep it easy and simple for the general population. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am constantly reminded of the director of &quot;Elizabeth&quot; with Cate Blanchett. That person admitted out loud that he hadn&#039;t a clue about his subject matter! At least the writers of The Tudors know that they&#039;re taking liberties with what actually happened.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If any of this gets other people interested in learning the &#039;truth&#039;, then more power to the people who put the words on paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How refreshing that a writer of a series admits up front that a lot of what he wrote was for entertainment value&#8230;and not for a history lesson!</p>
<p>Although those of us who know the story of the Tudors inside and out find the &#8216;real&#8217; story doesn&#8217;t need any doctoring, a series like this does have to keep it easy and simple for the general population. </p>
<p>I am constantly reminded of the director of &#8220;Elizabeth&#8221; with Cate Blanchett. That person admitted out loud that he hadn&#8217;t a clue about his subject matter! At least the writers of The Tudors know that they&#8217;re taking liberties with what actually happened.</p>
<p>If any of this gets other people interested in learning the &#8216;truth&#8217;, then more power to the people who put the words on paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
